I have pretty much been a supporter of the red-light cameras in Toledo since the day the idea first came up. It doesn't hurt that during those 11 years, I've gotten only one ticket generated by them -- stretched a yellow just a bit too much, so I probably deserved it. But despite that support, I'm disturbed by the Bell administration's stated plan to use fine revenue from the 11 newest cameras, which city council approved Tuesday as part of Toledo's new budget to pay for recreation programs.
It's one thing to put cameras up when the motivation is traffic safety. Toledo has had a lot of problems with red-light running over the years, and an Insurance Institute for Highway Safety analysis released last year found that the city's cameras have been effective at curbing that. If revenue from camera-based fines is then also used to pay for more traffic police, who can step up "live" speed and red-light enforcement throughout Toledo, that's a win for everybody.
Declaring that the money will be used for recreation programs, on the other hand, severely compromises the camera program's integrity. Once the mission becomes revenue generation, instead of traffic safety, the temptation grows to tweak the system to be unfair to drivers if they actually become more law-abiding and fine income drops. The most common complaint about the cameras is that jurisdictions use "short yellows" to trap drivers. I have no evidence that Toledo has ever done this; as far as I can tell, the yellows on Toledo traffic signals are plenty long enough for anybody traveling at or below the speed limit to stop safely. But earmarking the revenue for ballfields and tennis courts only provides ammunition for critics who are suspicious of the whole enterprise and believe the cameras are a Big Brother-esque invasion of privacy, rather than having a legitimate purpose.
Beyond that, I'm not persuaded that all of these cameras' proposed locations will be beneficial. I'll cite the proposed location I'm most familiar with: the Anthony Wayne Trail and the eastern side of Glendale Avenue. Is there really a lot of red-light running by Trail motorists there? The inbound side strikes me as especially suspect. From my experience, a camera at that intersection would do the most good if it were set up to catch eastbound drivers on Glendale running the light as they enter the Trail, which I see a lot more often than any other red-light violation there.
Another stoplight I've seen severely blown on more than one occasion is on northbound Erie Street at Jackson Street in downtown Toledo. Yep, right by police headquarters. There have been three or four times when, had I started moving as soon as I got the green on Jackson, I'd have been T-boned by a speeder on Erie.
I'd rather not devolve into a debate about the merits of the entire red-light camera program, but I'm very interested to hear what other drivers think of the proposed locations. Do you have any better ideas?